Not only wasn't the initial August 2014 report a "disaster", but it has since been revised up to 218,000. And 2014 was the best year for employment gains since the '90s. Some "disaster"!
Here is a table of revisions for August since 2005. Note that most of the revisions have been up. This doesn't mean that the August 2016 revision will be up, but it does seem likely. I'm not sure why the BLS has underestimated job growth in August (possibly because of the timing of seasonal teacher hiring and the end of the summer jobs).
Overall I think the August 2016 employment report was decent and indicates further improvement in the labor market.
| August Employment Report (000s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Initial | Revised | Revision |
| 2005 | 169 | 194 | +25 |
| 2006 | 128 | 181 | 53 |
| 2007 | -4 | -24 | -20 |
| 2008 | -84 | -266 | -182 |
| 2009 | -216 | -212 | 4 |
| 2010 | -54 | -34 | 20 |
| 2011 | 0 | 107 | 107 |
| 2012 | 96 | 190 | 94 |
| 2013 | 169 | 269 | 100 |
| 2014 | 142 | 218 | 76 |
| 2015 | 173 | 150 | -23 |
| 2016 | 151 | --- | --- |
Note: In 2008, the BLS significantly under reported job losses. That wasn't surprising since the initial models the BLS used missed turning points (something I wrote about in 2007). The BLS has since improved this model.
from
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/Y0wlBcadTwA/august-employment-revisions.html
No comments:
Post a Comment